Liberals Escape to BlueSky’s Censorship Bubble

When major social media platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter ramped up mass censorship during the pandemic and the 2020 election cycle, conservatives fled to alternatives where they could speak freely: Rumble, Parler, Gettr, Gab, Truth Social, among others.

These platforms have largely remained echo chambers. Despite Rumble securing millions in funding, its most popular videos still garner very low views, and its user interface remains inferior to that of X (formerly Twitter) or YouTube. Some of the alternatives, like Parler, no longer even exist.

The belief that these platforms could rival the mainstream ones in influence and prestige — where both sides of the debate were historically featured — proved to be misguided.

Now, BlueSky is having its moment. Some liberals and progressives began leaving Twitter after Elon Musk’s takeover and the platform’s transformation into X. Many others only decided to leave after Trump’s recent re-election, blaming X for aiding the former president's return to power.

Citing X as a source of misinformation, they claim that Musk has skewed the algorithm to favor right-wing content and suppress liberal views. In reality, Pew Research shows that X’s user base is nearly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans.

The Wall Street Journal found that conservative content often gains more traction through the algorithm than liberal content, but the reason lies in engagement. As the recent election demonstrated, conservative messages resonate more with voters.

Additionally, as Upward News has reported, X’s algorithm still promotes ideologies that conflict with Musk's or Donald Trump's, such as anti-Israel rhetoric.

Liberals and progressives are migrating to BlueSky, with The New York Times praising it for its “feeling of freedom.” Since Trump’s re-election, BlueSky has gained eight million new users, reaching a total of 20 million.

BlueSky’s appeal lies in its simplicity, lacking the algorithmic feeds that dominate platforms like Instagram. Many users have long desired an escape from algorithm-driven content prioritization.

However, BlueSky’s censorship and content moderation policies are extreme, a feature progressives appear to embrace. The platform’s community guidelines prohibit "harassment or abuse" of any individual or group, "including but not limited to sexual harassment and gender identity-based harassment."

The platform’s speech limit is pushed to its edge on gender ideology. Conservatives who tested the boundaries on BlueSky by stating that there are only two genders were promptly banned. This mirrors the pre-Musk Twitter environment, where users faced similar bans for comparable statements.

If liberals and progressives seek a censorship-heavy echo chamber that will likely continue narrowing the scope of permissible speech — as seen over two decades of growing political correctness — they’ve found it in BlueSky.

But if they seek a platform that fosters open dialogue among all voices, from everyday users to global leaders, BlueSky is not it. Even The New York Times acknowledges this reality.