On Friday, the judge in the subway chokehold case against Daniel Penny dismissed the manslaughter charge after the jurors failed to reach a consensus. Yesterday, the jury found Penny not guilty on the second and final charge of negligent homicide. Penny is now a free man.

Last spring, Penny — a former Marine — was riding the New York City subway when a 30-year-old homeless man, Jordan Neely, became extremely aggressive with passengers and began threatening to kill people. Penny stepped in and put Neely in a chokehold to subdue him — Neely was inadvertently killed.

A wave of sympathetic left-wing media outlets quickly targeted Penny, who is white, for killing Neely, a black man, attempting to draw parallels to the George Floyd case. Much of the press, including New York Magazine, extensively covered Neely’s subway dancing career. They highlighted Neely’s performances as a Michael Jackson impersonator while downplaying the fact that he was extremely mentally ill, reportedly hospitalized dozens of times for claiming to hear the voice of the devil and the deceased rapper Tupac.

Conservatives near-universally rejoiced at the not-guilty verdict. Journalist Chris Rufo declared that it signified the end of the “BLM era.” Commentator Ben Shapiro is among those who argued that the case should never have gone to trial, and Penny's innocence was evident from the outset.

Democrats also voiced support for the trial’s outcome, like NYC council member Robert Holden (D-Queens), who remarked that Daniel Penny “bravely stepped up to protect fellow New Yorkers during a moment of danger.”

Not all left-wingers felt the same way, however. Rev. Al Sharpton proclaimed that “Jordan Neely’s life was brutally taken away because of unnecessary vigilantism.” Sharpton, joined by other left-wingers like Medhi Hassan, viewed the incident as an example of systemic racism, where a white vigilante can murder black men without repercussion.

Protests broke out after the verdict was announced, including one violent clash outside the courthouse. While some on the left are calling for a racial reckoning in response to Penny's acquittal, one thing remains clear: no evidence has shown that Penny intended to kill Neely. In fact, he may have saved some of the lives of his fellow subway passengers from a menacing, mentally ill homeless man.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Bob Hrebec2 years ago

Playing the race card is getting very very old!

Avatar

Laney B2 years ago

Please don't be the only news voice calling Al Sharpton "Reverend". NoBody is still dignifying that charlatan with that title.

Daniel Penny's arrest and trial was a NY political stunt that even included a judge who tried to manipulate the jury into "some kind of" guilty verdict. Kudos to them for seeing the truth and declaring the man Innocent. Now may the father of Neely be stopped in his pursuit of a civil case.

Avatar

David Sells2 years ago

Why was Neely homeless if he had family? Where were they? They are so quick to blame yet if they were so concerned why wasn’t he in their care? Could it be they too were afraid of him and didn’t want him around? Hypocrites.

Avatar

Vicki Small2 years ago

They may have loved him but knew he was potentially dangerous to them, to any little kids in the family. They may even have been frustrated that he was not institutionalized at the time, but were or felt helpless against the system he was in. Maybe. And maybe they didn't want him on their hands, but see a chance to get some money out of the "white guy who brutally killed him." (That's not a direct quotation from anyone.)

Avatar

Alc Cookeville2 years ago

Democrats seem to like mob rule when they're the mob. They have BLM and Antifa, similar to Hitler's SA and SD to attack and intimidate conservatives, or to let out rage. After all, 'democracy' means 'mob rule'. True to their name.

Avatar

claude chase2 years ago

I'm confused, why do all the news outlets keep calling it a "Choke-Hold", if it was a chokehold the man would have blacked-out in the first minute. To me it seems to have been a headlock - how ells would the drugged-up homeless man last for six minutes, the guy was threatening to kill people, Penny did not know if there was a weapon on the guy, so taking him down from behind was a logical choice. just my opinion !

Avatar

Rich Henke2 years ago

I hope that if the DA is ever terrorized on the subway by a mentally ill person someday… or maybe a Venezuelan gang member, no one comes to his aid (for fear of prosecution, of course).

Avatar

Ricky T2 years ago

This shouldn't have gone to trial in the first place. And it wouldn't have if JN was black.

Avatar

sharon smith2 years ago

This is yet another Golden Opportunity to highlight racism by our political Black Players, instead of looking at this case as Justice Served. As in the case of Trump's first term as our president, those politically motivated Dems kept their names in the news for those 4 yrs to gain traction for the next election, dissing every great thing Trump said and did. Since then, I've become staunchly anti-media and anti-establishment!

Avatar

Eleanor Gibson2 years ago

It worked this time!!!!