Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, a landmark case challenging Tennessee’s law banning transgender medical procedures for minors. The law, aimed at protecting children from irreversible medical interventions, has been targeted by the Biden administration and activist groups, who claim it constitutes sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause. This rests on the idea that one’s “sex” is whatever they say it is.

Opponents of these procedures point out that the treatments are experimental, often harmful, and profit-driven, forming part of a multibillion-dollar industry where drug companies receive life-long customers.

During oral arguments, Justice Samuel Alito confronted the Biden administration’s solicitor general, citing the Cass Review — an independent review of gender identity services for children and young people in the United Kingdom, which found no evidence that puberty blockers or hormones reduce suicide rates among transgender-identifying youth.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts suggested the issue belongs in state legislatures, emphasizing the lack of scientific consensus. Justice Clarence Thomas is arguably the most conservative member of the court, so despite his usual quietness during oral arguments, he is likely to be in favor of the Tennessee ban.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson likened Tennessee’s protections for minors to bans on interracial marriage, a comparison that drew mockery from conservatives online.

Although Justice Neil Gorsuch often aligns with the conservatives, he joined Roberts and the court's liberals in the 2020 Bostock v. Clayton County decision, which extended Civil Rights Act protections to employees facing discrimination based on their “gender identity” — a stance strongly opposed by the other conservative justices. As of now, Gorsuch remains a wild card.

The court’s ruling could have major implications, impacting similar laws in over 25 states. With Tennessee leading the way, the case will decide the fate of countless children who could be prescribed surgeries, cross-sex hormones, and puberty blockers to attempt to transition to a different gender. A decision is expected by June 2025.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Bob Hrebec2 years ago

It's unbelievable to me this is even an issue. Where is common sense? There's no such thing as a transgender. You're either male, female, or very very confused.

Avatar

Laney B2 years ago

This issue belongs in No One's legislature, state or federal. It was decided long, long ago, when "in His image God made them; male and female He created them." GE 1.27 All else is lie, delusion, confusion.

Avatar

Ernest Sidlo2 years ago

Dr. Josef Mengele, the deranged Nazi doctor is the poster boy of this maniacal practice... The sooner this madness of 'gender affirming care' woke garbage is forbidden the better...

Avatar

Chuck Evans2 years ago

In the Scriptures, Jesus answers His accusers with the argument:“‭And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:” Matthew 12:25. We have come to a juncture in civilization where persons are biologically, "divided against themselves." The weak among us are being led by unprincipled professionals to oppose what cannot be opposed: their own sex. We need pray for these deceived ones, the coming desolation will be horrendous.

Avatar

Chris Wilke2 years ago

Dear Father God, Please protect our children 🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen and Amen