CNN reported that Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Bill Hagerty (R-TN) are both in contention for the secretary of state position in the next Trump administration.

For years, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) has been discussed as a potential secretary of defense, though Axios reported that he ruled himself out of any cabinet positions. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), on the other hand, expressed openness to rumors that he could be nominated for secretary of transportation.

The benefits are clear: senators are more likely to be confirmed by their colleagues, and they bring with them high-level federal experience. However, the GOP only has 53 Senate seats; It’s a clear majority, but not an overwhelming one, leaving room for only a few defections.

The downside of senators being nominated for cabinet positions means there will have to be special elections, which can often go poorly for incumbent parties.

When Trump selected then-Senator Jeff Sessions for attorney general, it seemed like a safe bet to win another election in ruby-red Alabama. However, Democrat Doug Jones ended up winning a shock victory in the special election, depriving the GOP of a key seat.

Losing Senate seats is a major setback for the president's agenda, as Congress shapes and ultimately passes the executive’s legislative priorities.

In 2010, under President Obama, a Massachusetts special election held after the death of Sen. Ted Kennedy (D) was won by Republican Scott Brown, breaking the supermajority Democrats had won in 2008. Brown effectively blocked the Democrats from making further changes to the Affordable Care Act, derailing a key piece of Obama’s legislative agenda.

Special elections are a gamble — and ultimately may be too risky for Trump and Republicans.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Jim Dee2 years ago

Of the senators mentioned, I would ask each of them, if not them, then who? Who would they recommend, saving their senate seat

Avatar

Jonathan Horen2 years ago

An excellent suggestion... elegant, too.

Avatar

Laura Cegalis2 years ago

I agree that senators from the Republican party should be left in their place. The country has clearly stated it wants a Republican government, owning the senate is important. Let's not leave room for an election that could vote in the non-party.

Avatar

William Cole2 years ago

Plenty of good candidates outside senate. Don’t mess up the hard won majority

Avatar

Chris Carbott2 years ago

Definitely leave the Senators in place! Maintaining the slim majority in the Senate is crucial and not worth the risk of a special election. Additionally, as others here have noted, the Senators have an obligation to their constituents to serve out their full terms. There are plenty of talented, capable persons on the sidelines that can fill the positions needed.

Avatar

Leonard Matthews2 years ago

I remember when George W. Bush won the election with a win in the House & Senate. What great expectations the public had to hold the majority in all three branches of government. Yet almost nothing monumental changed. In fact, because of 911 it seemed like things continued to go downhill from a conservative standpoint. Since Trump does not have the old time political connections perhaps he can successfully make the changes that we conservatives have hoped and dreamed of for a long time. He needs to be overly cautious about all of these positions or he may find himself in similar situations that he did in his first term.

Avatar

Bob Hrebec2 years ago

Play it safe! Don't risk your majority, the gamble is to great.

Avatar

Tom Barnhart2 years ago

Yes they are a gamble. Especially when the majority is only a few seats. President Trump should completely avoid taking senators or representatives unless their permanent replacements are going to be appointed by Republican governors.

Avatar

Jonathan Horen2 years ago

I agree with all the previous comments. I would like to add that -- as I opined during the Republican primary season, regarding my/our state governor, Ronald DeSantis -- these senators... office holders... were elected by their constituents and, as such, should not be considered for positions that would remove them from those offices. Election to a state office is the result of a lengthy (and expensive) process; that process ought to be respected, and not short-circuited. They should serve their full terms-of-office.

Avatar

Ernest Sidlo2 years ago

No commander would give the order to 'charge' and leave the cavalry short handed... Some of the trouble makers are gone but not enough... Vet closely and use the talent pool... If they screw up, President Trump knows how to fire duds...

Avatar

Christopher Martin2 years ago

Yeah it’s risky nominating them. There are plenty of good qualified people to choose from.

Avatar

Vicki Small2 years ago

I had no idea. I thought they would have to be replaced by members of the same party. Given the reality, I hope they stay in place. But not all will.