Members can watch the full interview video. Join here →

The progressive movement that dominated the Democratic Party beginning in the Obama era is rapidly losing ground.

Ideas that once seemed politically unchallengeable on the left — from defunding police to abolishing fossil fuels — have hit a wall of public rejection by the voters.

These ideas were carried by the energy of Black Lives Matter protests, the Squad, and Bernie Sanders-style populism, but are now under attack from left-leaning thought leaders as Democrats struggle to find a leader and a singular message. Right now, they are defined by opposing Trump and the GOP.

Voters overwhelmingly prefer equal opportunity over enforced “equity.” The Democrats’ open-border ideology flooded America with illegal crossings. Now, even Hispanic voters, who have in recent decades been aligned with Democrats, support mass deportation plans.

Progressive prosecutors were elected in major cities, and then ousted as crime rose and voters demanded order. “Defund the police” is political dead weight. Most Americans support more police funding and tougher crime policies, especially nonwhite and working-class voters.

As for the climate agenda and proposals like the Green New Deal, voters are now prioritizing reliable, affordable energy, including oil and gas, not just wind and solar.

Poll after poll shows voters want secure borders, effective policing, fair treatment instead of identity politics, and energy affordability — not revolution.

Progressives misread the public. The public corrected course.

So, as the Democratic Party’s progressive momentum fades, some of its top thinkers are trying to regain stability by returning to the political center.

One of the most prominent voices in that effort is Ruy Teixeira, a seasoned political scientist and commentator whose ideas on elections carry real weight. Many of the party’s top leaders listen to him. He’s also the founder of the excellent, thought-provoking The Liberal Patriot. You can read it here.

What comes next is far from certain. The progressive takeover of the Democratic Party wasn’t slow or orderly — it was fast, sweeping, and spread like a virus, often through decentralized movements. So now the question is: Can a top-down reset actually cure the Democrats of their woke fever? And if so, what would that even look like?

One idea gaining traction is called “abundance.” The name is odd, but it’s being pushed by some thought leaders like Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson as a new governing philosophy: a strong central government that actually works — efficient, competent, and effective.

But that may be a tough sell. The Democrats have long embraced big government, and the result has been the opposite of abundance: bloated, wasteful, and broken systems. It’s hard to imagine the same people who created the mess being the ones to fix it.

I spoke to Ruy to get all these questions answered.

Ari: One thing that really stands out is your criticism of the Democratic Party. Some of your pieces read like Republican talking points. So, why not just join the Republican Party? Why stay aligned with the Democrats if you're so critical of them?

Ruy: That's a fair question. Part of it is just history — I've been oriented toward the Democrats for decades, so there's an identity component. But that alone wouldn’t be enough.

I have a lot of criticism for the Democrats, but joining the Republicans would mean aligning with Trump and his version of the party, which I’m not on board with.

Also, Republicans have traditionally been hostile to the welfare state and much more dogmatic about free markets. While I’m market-oriented, I’m not a libertarian. That said, the GOP is changing. Some parts of it are more appealing now. I’ve even considered calling myself an independent…

Redshift: Members-Only

Join now to access this article and all our exclusive, behind-the-scenes coverage of the conservative movement.

Try free

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Sue clayton1 year ago

I think "abundance" is too illusive. Abundance for who? Abundance in what? Regular voters no matter what party still want less crime, illegal immigrants to pay in some way for coming to the US illegally. They want reasonable prices for every day products. The main difference between Republicans and Democrats is Democrats want the government to take care of them and Republicans want the government to provide the opportunity to take care of ourselves.

Avatar

Laney B1 year ago

You can put lipstick on a pig but the pig still worships and dies on the altar of a "woman's right to choose to eliminate her baby". No matter what pretty name the (D)eath party puts on their "new" ideology, that #1 will never change.

Avatar

Doug Griffin1 year ago

As a registered Independant I would welcome the opportunity to choose between two "viable" candidates in the presidential election. To make my choice based on policy as opposed to chaos, insanity and extremism. Since the Obama administration I have been forced to vote against the extreme. I much rather prefer to vote between two intelligent policy options.

Avatar

Than Johnson1 year ago

We know the winning party generally takes their victory to far in the 1st half of the Presidential term. Overreaches and results in a defeat at the poles in either the House or the Senate in the next election. Democrats now are where we Republicans were in the President Obama first 2 years. We coalesced around sound federal policy and slowed the movement to the left. I hope that we look at certain policies as a ‘bridge to far’ such as massive cuts to Medicaid or tax relief to perceived Elitist Class at expense of middle class. Efficient and effective federal government with strong defense should be the goal. I do worry that ‘national debt increases’ seemed to be a minor issue at this time . Than

Avatar

g mich1 year ago

medicaid for for low income not middle class

Avatar

Monty Mickle1 year ago

If democrats want to keep up the open borders, green energy WOKE nonsense it'll be glory days for Republicans,