• Presidential voting is already underway in several states, though election results are not expected to be speedy

  • Donald Trump, once a fierce opponent of early and mail-in voting, is now pushing hard for it

  • America offers some of the earliest voting in the world, making October debates or late-breaking events less meaningful

The story

The 2024 election is already underway as Virginia, Vermont, Minnesota, and South Dakota have begun early voting, and absentee voting has begun in North Carolina. Illinois starts early voting on Thursday, and most other US states begin throughout October.

Election integrity has become a major sticking point for both Democrats and Republicans, as the latter, spearheaded by former President Donald Trump, are now making a big push for Republican voters to cast their vote early.

However, early voting presents challenges, such as confusion surrounding mail-in ballots, which could threaten the safety and security of the election process.

In Pennsylvania, for example, voters who requested mail-in ballots still have not received them, as the state Supreme Court is causing delays. This process could drag out until early October, depending on the county, adding another layer of confusion to what was intended to be a simple, effective voting process.

And even with over one month of early and mail-in voting, the results of the US presidential election are expected to be drawn out. One city commissioner in Philadelphia claimed that the odds of knowing which candidate won on Election Day is “almost zero.” A Wisconsin official echoed the same sentiment, saying the final tally will likely not be finished until the morning after the election.

The politics

During a rally in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump criticized early voting as “stupid” but still urged voters to cast their ballots early, acknowledging its importance in securing a win in the battleground state.

Trump further remarked, “Now we have this stupid stuff where you can vote 45 days early,” saying that you’re left wondering “what the hell happens during that 45 days.” He now wants his supporters to vote early in such large numbers that the election becomes “too big to rig.”

Republicans are following Trump’s lead, telling voters to embrace mail-in and early voting despite Trump’s aversion to it in 2020. Trump discouraged mail-in and early voting in the last election, claiming that these methods were prone to widespread fraud.

Democrats tend to be strong proponents of early and mail-in voting and strongly rebuke the former president’s claims about widespread fraud.

In the last election, most mail-in voters cast their ballots for Democrats. Trump now sees an opportunity to use these systems to his advantage.

Beyond the headlines

With some states offering early voting around six weeks before the presidential election, the United States offers some of the most liberal voting laws in the entire developed world. Because of this, many aspects of traditional campaigning become irrelevant.

For instance, Kamala Harris agreed to debate Donald Trump again in late October, but by that time, tens of millions of votes would already have been cast, rendering another presidential debate much less consequential.

Additionally, early voting allows individuals to cast their ballots long before all the relevant information is available. In the weeks leading up to an election, critical events can unfold, candidates can change their messaging or positions, and new issues may emerge that could significantly impact voter choices.

This lack of flexibility risks voters casting ballots based on outdated or incomplete information, which undermines the idea of making a fully informed choice.

All of this comes in addition to election integrity concerns surrounding millions of non-citizens potentially voting and the Biden administration fast-tracking newly naturalized citizens to get them enrolled to vote.

Why it matters

The complexity of extended early voting periods, combined with confusion over mail-in ballots and dragged-out ballot counting, risks undermining the transparency and simplicity of America’s voting process.

While Donald Trump recommends surging the number of early votes, the integrity of the process will ultimately come down to the trustworthiness of those counting the ballots, according to the GOP.

The Republican National Committee’s deployment of over 100,000 poll watchers, its army of attorneys, and the passage of numerous state laws aimed at tightening election procedures could reduce some of these risks.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Vicki Small2 years ago

In the past 25 years, or more, election results have depended too greatly on the integrity of vote counters and poll watchers. Possibly before that, as well, but especially since the debaucle following the Bush-Gore election.

Avatar

Michael Nelson2 years ago

If you don't have that integrity, then where does the integrity occur?

Avatar

Paul Bohac2 years ago

Voting has never been intended as a "right" as defined within either the Bill of Rights or the other Constitutional Amendments that followed. It has historically been viewed as a "privilege" that each state would grant to each of its citizens who met certain voter eligibility requirements. The Civil Rights movement of the '60's, followed by the rise of the liberal, progressive movement within the Democratic Party has done much to blur if not erase the original view of voting. The combining of those two forces, the corresponding rise of social welfare programs and the ever-growing cacophony claiming that "voting is a right" has resulted in both early voting and mail-in ballots. Instead of demonstrating "democracy in action" they have managed to create something entirely different. Loose immigration laws, variations in state voter registration requirements, questionable procedures regarding mail-in ballot authentication and early voting 1-2 months before election day.

Avatar

Joe Busch2 years ago

Has any entity been identified to determine if the voting machines have not been tampered? I think the voting process is a big hole in our elections.

Avatar

Michael Nelson2 years ago

Spot On! We need to consider what would happen if millions of voters vote early, and Trump is imprisoned...or worse. More time to vote means more time to screw around with the vote. We need to get back to a day of voting, and if it takes another day to count, so be it.

Avatar

Scott Connell2 years ago

A SAFE Act is needed at this point to mandate proof of citizenship for voting. The only problem is, not one Democrat will vote for it - what do they fear about someone showing ID to vote????