WHAT’S HAPPENING

A recent New York Times investigation found that influencers across the political spectrum are accepting thousands of dollars from campaigns to endorse candidates, often hiding payments through layers of vendors and middlemen.

The practice has exploded ahead of the midterms, with some creators receiving six-figure sums for posts that appear organic to their audiences.

The rest of this story is for members.

Read stories the media hides, with uncensored insights and expert analysis. Delivered in a daily email.

Get 30 days for $1.99 →

A subscription gets you:

  • The 5-minute morning briefing. Today's biggest stories, fast.
  • Spin and hoaxes, debunked. So you never get fooled.
  • The stories the media buries. Simple, and summarized.
  • Analysis, never opinions. You decide what to think.
  • 🎧 Audio version for on-the-go

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Rich Henke2 months ago

The purchase of elections is nothing new but it’s long past time to put a stop to it and to impose criminal penalties for this unethical behavior regardless of which political party does it.

Avatar

Photo Man2 months ago

"Should influencers disclose all payments made by political campaigns?" YES! I have always said the first problem with politics is $$$$$$$$.

Avatar

Michael H.2 months ago

ANY payment OUT to a source that reaches as much, if not more in some cases, viewership as any television/cable/radio program needs to be reported! I have no doubt there are "influencers" singing the praises of candidates they know NOTHING about, except they put money into their pocket for the endorsement.

The other scary thing is that young people are believing the OPINIONS of influencers to be actual NEWS. They are listening to a talking head parroting whatever message they have been trained to deliver. TRUE journalism is close to being extinct. Find a REAL and RELIABLE source for news is getting more and more difficult. Makes me more grateful that Upward News is available!

Avatar

James G.2 months ago

Right!

Avatar

Fred Scott2 months ago

They certainly should be required to disclose all payments, both foreign and domestic sources.

Avatar

Jim Powers2 months ago

Yes. People seeing these opinion videos need to know where they are coming from.

Avatar

Greg Davis2 months ago

Absolutely without question. Payment for opinions is Fraud.

Avatar

David Hooten2 months ago

Yes, of course. Otherwise, it is immoral and unethical IMHO.

Avatar

Janet Null2 months ago

ABSOLUTELY!

Avatar

sharon smith2 months ago

Everyone else has to, so yeh; definitely!

Avatar

Karl Hermansen2 months ago

Absolutely. And make a BIG deal out of it. It has to be federal legislation with truly high fines for violations and some high profile arrests, in order to make the point stick. The "Internet" and its corresponding "apps" on phones are not only destroying our children's attention spans and learning abilities, but they are seriously degrading their moral fiber and sense, or even knowledge, of ethics and the reason for laws. At this point, it is imperative to use law to re-establish a balance between what is expected and legal behavior, and what is unacceptable and illegal. These new technologies do not yet have an adequate legal framework.

Avatar

James G.2 months ago

I agree with you, but it’s also the parents responsibility to monitor a child’s activity on an electronic device… I’m speaking from experience.

I have nieces and nephews that didn’t even touch a phone until they were 15 years old! My siblings made sure to raise their kids on books and critical thinking. And when my nieces and nephews finally got a phone, they were strict parental controls on them.

So yeah, phones are a bad influence on children. And parents should be monitoring it! Parents are just as much to blame.

Avatar

Jim Harmon2 months ago

Campaign reform has never been needed as much as now. The bill Rep Luna is a good step indeed, but Congress needs to be aggressive if fixing how what I think is fraudulent influence. Of course, they will be reluctant to do anything because many in Congress are benefitting from it. Just as the fraud in Minnesota and California has to be fixed, campaigns benefitting by paying influencers to "influence" voters is fraud. If candidates can't win on their own merit, then cheating the system shouldn't be allowed.

Avatar

Cassandra Jamieson2 months ago

100% they need to put in the description and in the video that the video has been paid Advertising for (insert name or organization)

Avatar

Stefan Cameron2 months ago

Absolutely they should disclose all payments they take for any form of advertising. "Influencing" is just another form of advertising in my view, and a very deceptive one.

Avatar

James G.2 months ago

WTF? Do people really get the news from social media? That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. “Influencers” are nothing more than a kid standing in a hall at school spreading rumors!

The biggest problem I see is peoples own ignorance. I would never in a million years think that trusting ‘news’ on social media is a good idea. How dumb is that!?!?!?

Full disclosure on income? Well ya!

Avatar

Photo Man2 months ago

James = "Do people really get the news from social media? That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard." Sometimes , I think you have fallen out of the loonie bin. And this is one of them. Look at the addiction people get from getting the news from Facebook, X, UTube, TikTok, a plethora of podcasts, etc and the viewers eat it up like it is candy.

Avatar

Mike Tucker2 months ago

I am against it for the sole reason that, Influencers, in many cases, are small businesses that are not required to disclose their finances. Campaigns are required to disclose their spending. The problem is tracking the money.

Avatar

Bonnie Hissom2 months ago

Yes. Why not? It’s unethical. It’s deceptive. It’s dishonest. Etc, etc,

Avatar

Nancy Bucceri2 months ago

Yes, of course

Avatar

Virginia Nurmi2 months ago

Yes! Political influencing for personal gain, no matter the means, should be disclosed.

Avatar

Angie Clark2 months ago

Yes, newspapers have to; influencers are "sharing news" and opinions.

Avatar

Laney B2 months ago

Yes make them disclose to whom they are peddling their "influence" for payment! Is that not a bribe? I am deeply saddened that there even IS a "profession" called Influencer.

Avatar

Cyndee Pacheco2 months ago

Of course!

Avatar

Don G2 months ago

Absolutely! The hidden political agenda has turned to sedation.

Avatar

Jim Powers 2 months ago

Yes.

Avatar

Ken Ahern2 months ago

Yes, but that’s not enough. All elections should limit donations to the citizens of the jurisdiction of the election. Residents of one state should not be allowed to donate to a candidate or cause at any level in a different state. This includes senators and representatives to the House.

Avatar

Than Johnson2 months ago

Yes but how do you police it? Can we legally require each influencers to file an expense report each year when filing their business taxes listing where their income came from? Then we will see unrecognizable business resources listed such as Russian government payments covered up by fake corporations or associations. No different when we ask for data from our own Federal agency Homeland Security on whether their arrests are only of felons or criminals? Than

Avatar

James G.2 months ago

AI can and should be used to track payments online. It’s only a matter of time until an ‘AI Police Force’ will monitor digital campaign funding.

Avatar

Ray Oden 2 months ago

Yes.