_WHAT’S HAPPENING_

With Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei absent from public view since his father's assassination in February — and possibly even dead — Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has consolidated control over the country's wartime government. Major General Ahmad Vahidi, the IRGC's new commander, has emerged as the de facto power broker in Tehran, directing both military operations and the regime's approach to peace negotiations with the United States.

The transition became evident when Iran's delegation abruptly pulled back from talks with the Trump team in Pakistan after Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi suggested flexibility on key issues.

Vahidi's allies in the Supreme National Security Council reportedly complained that Araghchi had exceeded his mandate, prompting Tehran to recall the negotiating team. Iran has since refused to return to the table.

_THE FACTS_

  • Ahmad Vahidi, 67, became IRGC commander after the Feb. 28 airstrikes killed former commander Mohammad Pakpour and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

  • Vahidi is an internationally wanted terrorist with an Interpol red notice for his role in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people.

  • He previously served as commander of Iran's elite Quds Force in the 1990s, building Iran's terror proxy network before handing control to Qasem Soleimani.

  • The European Union sanctioned Vahidi in 2022 for the regime's use of live ammunition against protesters, which killed nearly 500 people according to human rights groups.

  • Parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf is another hardliner who has near-total control over the current war effort.

  • Ghalibaf is a longtime senior IRGC commander with deep ties to the regime’s repressive security apparatus, and has a proven willingness to use force to preserve the Islamic Republic’s authoritarian control.

  • The IRGC controls the Supreme National Security Council, which coordinates military, intelligence and foreign policy decisions in Iran.

  • Iran seized two cargo ships in the Strait of Hormuz this week, maintaining its aggressive maritime posture.

  • The IRGC has an estimated 200,000 uniformed members plus hundreds of thousands more in its volunteer Basij force.

_OUR TAKE_

Iran is now a country ruled by military generals instead of religious clerics. Ahmad Vahidi is a hardened fighter, and his past demonstrates he is unafraid to be brutal in his military aggression. Likewise, Ghalibaf is a product of Iran’s severe security apparatus, unafraid to crack down on Iranian citizens to maintain control.

With the negotiations in Islamabad deadlocked and with the Strait of Hormuz still at a stalemate between Iranian and US control, the IRGC appears to be clamping down hard, uninterested in a resolution to the war. The prospect of regime change — though not an explicit goal of the Trump administration — is now highly unrealistic.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Kent James7 months ago

Israel and the US should not stop now, until there IS regime change. We are in it now, and anything less than complete regime change means we're right back to square one, with billions wasted and nothing gained. Trump promised the Iranian people help was on the way. He needs to make good on the promise by whatever means necessary.

Avatar

Kent James7 months ago

The ideal "solution" would be to give Israel the green light to do whatever they need to do in Iran AND Lebanon, and then give them whatever they need to get the job done. Trump should also stop playing politics, and let Israel fully Annex Gaza, Samaria, and Judea.

Avatar

F. Williams7 months ago

Yes to annexation! Israel needs to stand stronger, even without Pres. Trump's green light.

Avatar

Robert Zuzzolo7 months ago

ABSOLUTELY

Avatar

Photo Man7 months ago

Regime change? YES! Those bullies need to go. Resume the war and take them out just like their other leaders were a few weeks ago. Time, Trump, to finish the mission. Then you need to concentrate upon the same tactical bullies here at home, called the Democratic Party, where there is Absolutely Nothing democratic about them. They are another IRGC.

Avatar

F. Williams7 months ago

A regime change is surely the only way anything would get better in Iran and the Middle East. How could anything improve with brutal generals in control? And yes, Crown Prince Reza Palavi is the rightful heir to Iran's throne, and I heard a large amount of the Iranian populous want him back.

Avatar

Michael H.7 months ago

The only way to be certain Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon is complete removal of the regime from power. As stated by others here already, if we, the US and Israel, stop short of regime change all of these efforts were for nothing.

I have spoken to a few Iranians who fled prosecution by the regime who said the people of Iran want desperately to be out from under the thumb of the regime. They just dont have the numbers and weapons to fight back against the IRGC. Their best chance for freedom is with US and Israeli victory.

Avatar

Earl Hufnagel7 months ago

Message to the Israel of God: With God we shall do valiantly; it is he who will tread down our foes. (Psalms 60:12) Trust in him at all times, O people; pour out your heart before him; God is a refuge for us. Selah (Psalms 62:8)

Avatar

Fred Scott7 months ago

It is most unfortunate that the leadership of IRGC wants to continue the reckless behavior of suppressing the people of Iran. While I pray that US troops on the ground will not be needed to take action to destroy these hateful terrorists, regime change seems to be the only remedy now for the sake of the Iranian people and the world.

Avatar

Angie Clark7 months ago

I know its idealistic but the people should lead. What happened to the rightful heir of Iran? A totalitarian is a totalitarian no matter what garb he wears.

Avatar

Photo Man7 months ago

The real people cannot lead because they will be shot by the fearless IRGC. You gotta destroy the IRGC. Tall task. This has gone on way too long with wimped out Demo & Repub Presidents who have allowed this too happen. Same scenario happening in USA.

Avatar

M Harrell7 months ago

Yes! We need to take out IRGC completely. I am sure that Israel should do that even without Trump approval.

Avatar

Bob Hrebec7 months ago

ABSOLUTELY change the regime!! Eliminate with the up most extreme prejudice ALL hardliners....military and cleric. Anything short of that is a loss, just kicking the can down the road and providing them with a winning attitude and an amplified feeling of hate and revenge.

Avatar

Than Johnson7 months ago

This was an anticipated result of the military terrorism supported IRGC taking control and subordinating the religious community. Therefore a step in wrong direction. Iran with this type of leadership/government maybe as threatening as the prior and should Not allowed to stand. We need to also cut off supply chain from Russia, NK and China. Than

Avatar

William Treadway7 months ago

There really isn’t any option. The problem is that the IRGC are now identified as the pigs they are. If they lose control they’ll be hunted down.

Start with the bridges. Maybe one or two a week. Then move on to the power plants and destroy one a week. If they still aren’t paying attention flatten Kharg island. Finally, declare a kilometer on each side of the straits unsuitable for habitation and that anything in that zone will be destroyed.

Avatar

Jim Harmon7 months ago

Shooting for regime change is important now more than ever. A deal is highly unlikely with Iran being controlled by military-minded leaders. Unfortunately, targeting bridges and refineries won't affect Vahidi in the same way it does the mullahs. If we were able to target the religious leaders, isn't it time to focus on the military guys? Is it time for Mossad to work their magic and target the IRGC leadership? The Iranian people deserve an aggressive end to this conflict. They've asked for it.

Avatar

Russ Shoemaker 7 months ago

At this point the correct answer would be ( YES ) Russ S

Avatar

JJW JJW7 months ago

YES. Destroy the IRGC and the Supreme National Security Council, which coordinates military, intelligence and foreign policy decisions in Iran. If we and other nations quit and go home terror will continue. If they are destroyed 1000;s of years of terror will end,. JJW

Avatar

Don G7 months ago

Change? Basic Cultural differences make that not possible. Diplomatic efforts will fail. With military might, the straight could be opened if political will comes forward. However, people today are coddled and don’t have the resolve of past generations.

Avatar

David Hooten7 months ago

I am really not unsure, but you left no other answer. The US and Israel should take out Iran's infrastructure, and remove as many of the IRGC people as they can. Hopefully, the citizenry can get their hands on weapons to take out the rogue regime and install a constitutional Republic or parliamentary structures government.

Avatar

Chris Carbott7 months ago

Yes. Regime change, with the associated stripping of power from IRGC hardliners, is the only way to make permanent changes in Iran.

Avatar

Rich B7 months ago

Destroy and disarm the IRGC. Demand and oversee that the Iranians elect leaders who understand freedom and are determined to live in peace with the rest of the world. Terrorism is not an option!

Avatar

Jim Powers 7 months ago

Yes.

Avatar

Jim Ahern7 months ago

Correction guys, Regime change/removal was very much a specific goal as originally laid out and very necessary to sustain peace in the Middle East. What good comes of taking out or control of Iran's nuclear arsenal, which hasn't been accomplished to my knowledge, if your going to leave the same cult following warmongers in place to run the country?? Did Trump not say he wanted to see a government of The People of Iran? Pretty sure he did. Trump also stated that the "US had control of Hormuz and that the war was essentially over" a couple weeks back. Not seemingly the case though is it, especially with you guys reporting that Hormuz is in some type of "stalemate control" standoff. Point is, none of this bodes well, especially in light of the way the Trump Admin. framed this so called clean cut (4 to 6 wk.) operation from the get go...

Avatar

Bernie Peer7 months ago

Yes, there needs to be regime change, however I think that means the current leaders will be eliminated.

Avatar

Dennis Reay7 months ago

YES to regime change. The people of Iran deserve more democracy.

Avatar

Steve Fredricks 7 months ago

Yes indeed

Avatar

Scott Connell7 months ago

If no regime change occurs, then we'll have to do this all over again! Trump holds all the "cards", take them down once and for all.

Avatar

Jim Powers7 months ago

No. It’s time to bomb the country out of existence and make sure the entire IRGC is in the line of fire.