• Media outlets are zeroing in on sexual assault allegations against Pete Hegseth, Trump’s top defense nominee

  • Eyewitness accounts largely corroborate Hegseth’s version of events, though the media left out nearly every exonerating detail

  • This follows patterns of selective reporting, including omissions in past cases like Tara Reade’s and Doug Emhoff’s ex-girlfriend's allegations

The story

In October 2017, Pete Hegseth, then a Fox News host and now Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense, attended a Republican women’s conference in Monterey, California.

One night during the event, Hegseth was seen at a hotel bar socializing with attendees, including one woman, referred to as Jane Doe. A romantic encounter that followed is now all over the news because of her accusation that Hegseth sexually assaulted her.

Security footage showed Jane Doe walking arm-in-arm with Hegseth, smiling as he whispered in her ear. Witnesses reported that Jane Doe appeared sober, though she later reported to police that events started to become “fuzzy” later in the evening. The two were seen leaving the bar together, and both admitted to later having sexual intercourse in Hegseth’s hotel room. According to Hegseth, the encounter was consensual.

However, four days later, Jane Doe went to a hospital and told medical staff she believed she had been sexually assaulted by Hegseth. She claimed the memory of the incident surfaced during intercourse with her husband, which she described as a "trigger." The hospital staff reported her claim to the police, who launched an investigation.

Surveillance footage and evidence from the bar and hotel corroborated much of Hegseth’s account. Notably, a witness who was with Jane Doe at the bar reported that Jane Doe had actively inserted herself between Hegseth and another woman to steal his attention.

Eyewitnesses from the hotel, including hotel staff, reported that while Hegseth appeared drunk, Jane Doe did not — even though, as later became clear, Doe implied to police that Hegseth had slipped her a date rape drug like Rohypnol. Even 30 minutes before the alleged assault, every witness identified Doe as appearing sober and lucid.

During his interview with investigators, he revealed Jane Doe felt guilty after their encounter, and, according to Hegseth, they agreed she would tell her husband she had fallen asleep on a couch in someone else’s room.

In a separate interview, Jane Doe’s husband stated that when she returned to their hotel room at 4 am — just 2 hours after the alleged assault — she “did not have a hard time walking and was not slurring her words.” This unprompted corroboration between Doe’s husband and Pete Hegseth cast significant doubt on her claim of being intoxicated or even possibly drugged — meaning Doe was likely sober during her sexual encounter.

The police ultimately referred the case to the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office, which chose not to press charges. The DA cited inconsistencies in Jane Doe’s account, corroborating evidence supporting Hegseth, and the lack of physical or circumstantial evidence suggesting rape.

The media’s failure

The coverage by the mainstream media of the incident near-universally painted Hegseth as the aggressor and omitted the crucial details that cast Jane Doe’s story into doubt.

Coverage omitted critical witness testimonies and the DA’s rationale for declining to prosecute. Instead, the narrative focused almost entirely on Jane Doe’s claims, leaving readers with an incomplete understanding of the case.

Outlets such as NPR, CBS News, the Associated Press, and ABC News never mention that witnesses, including Jane Dow’s own husband, never saw her appear intoxicated. Other publications that did (briefly) mention how she was seen to be sober still failed to acknowledge her husband’s testimony.

While many may see Hegseth’s affair with a married woman as immoral, the suggestion that Trump nominated a possible rapist to his cabinet is very likely false.

Why it matters

This selective reporting mirrors patterns seen in other high-profile cases. Coverage of sexual misconduct allegations against Joe Biden, like those of Tara Reade and other women, or the dismissal of assault claims from Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff’s ex-girlfriend, demonstrates their tendency to suppress or amplify stories based on political alignment.

Though Hegseth will undoubtedly be grilled on the incident during his Senate confirmation hearing, many Republicans have rallied behind him and are committed to securing his appointment as the next secretary of defense.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Maria Oxford 2 years ago

I have observed that the Democratic first line of defense is to dig up a woman from the past who is willing(paid?) to accuse Republican nominees. I have seen this over and over. In my lifetime it started with the Clarence Thomas/ Anita Hill fiasco and has repeated over and over to the present day. When it is a Democrat, as in the case of President Clinton, all is smoothed over and forgiven, while with a Republican the media and others stir up the pot in outrage.

Avatar

Ernest Sidlo2 years ago

This is nothing more than another left wing ambush.... The left loves sexual innuendos and rumors to try to make a case against Trump and his allies.... Sickening.... More reason to reject anything said or done by these liars attempting to create chaos.... We get it....

Avatar

Tracy Parsons2 years ago

I just recently subscribed to Upward News and this Hegseth article is EXACTLY the kind of reporting that I was expecting/hoping for. Thank You.

Avatar

Kate Devaney2 years ago

Dear Mr. Goldman, Your reporting the facts in this matter is what real journalism looks like. thank you. I would like mention that in your Thoughts section where you say "Their eyes are closed, and their ears are shut" I have to disagree. They are lying and deceiving with their eyes and ears wide open.

Avatar

Bob Hrebec2 years ago

So, are we supposed to be surprised that the mainstream media is biased?

Avatar

Gary B2 years ago

While I think he should not have done what he did there is a risk to drinking in similar circumstances and he set himself up to be shook down by a gold digger. His mistake is more excusable than the media’s sober efforts to misrepresent the facts. I hope her husband sent her packing after he got is cut!

Avatar

Vicki Small2 years ago

Brings the "me, too" movement to mind, and the idea that a woman claiming sexual assault should always be believed, even despite evidence to the contrary. Her husband's statements sure do work against her.

I'm a woman who never subscribed to the "believe 'em all" theory, anyway. I've lived long enough and known enough women to know better.

Avatar

Kevin Sargent2 years ago

Subpoena the other FALSE charge records, get confirmed THEN SUE HELL out of the B!TCH! Not only Slander but violation of the Hush Up Agreement!

Avatar

James Barbour2 years ago

More formulated, leftist lies from the propagandist media. Omission is lying.

Avatar

Jim Dee2 years ago

Others are more qualified for SecDef; however, none more qualified than the SecDef we need at this moment in time. We need 45,000 troops now, and anything that prevents that must go - DEI, etc.

Avatar

Bob Tasker2 years ago

Is the "Jane Doe" sure she wasn't having a drink with Bill Clinton? Sounds very much like the democrat case against Brett Kavanaugh.

Bob Tasker

Avatar

Susan Kurzman2 years ago

I think if Hegseth was a rapist, we would have heard more allegations with his exposure as a Fox personality. Hegseth is not my cuppa tea but really… I’m sure you could find, any hotel lounge, at least 20 women willingly ready to go with him to hit the mini-bar in his room.