_WHAT’S HAPPENING_

President Donald Trump called for Republicans to "nationalize" elections during a podcast appearance Monday with former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. Trump specifically said Republicans should "take over" voting in at least 15 places, targeting states he claims have "crooked" election procedures.

Critics have said the proposal runs contrary to the Constitution, which assigns election administration to state governments and grants Congress secondary regulatory authority over federal elections. Trump's comments come less than a week after FBI agents raided an elections facility in Fulton County, Georgia, seizing ballots from the 2020 election.

Insider Analysis Locked

Every daily article includes insider analysis you won’t find anywhere else—sharp, uncensored, and ahead of the curve.

See insights for this story

A subscription gets you:

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Laney B9 months ago

These are true concerns, alright, but I don't see the US as being able to stop DEMOcrat election fraud. There are no heads rolling in MN fraud exposure yet, either.

Avatar

Fred Scott9 months ago

I am not sure nationalizing elections is the right idea to pursue. What the Federal government should do is establish guidelines and regulations for Federal elections in all States only. Making sure all ballots are hand-counted and determined to be validly submitted by living U.S. Citizens only, and complete by the end of election day.

Avatar

Photo Man9 months ago

"Is Trump raising real concerns or pushing an unworkable idea?" Perhaps. It appears to me that there is not the same standard of elections law for every state to abide by, meaning there are too many variations, that ultimately become the election 'fighting' result to determine the winner of an electoral race. A standardization employed by every state should be immensely fairer than what we have witnessed the past decade or so. So perhaps this is what Trump means by voter nationalization.

Avatar

Mr. B9 months ago

There are so many Red Flags concerning Election Integrity in the past 50+ years, being from Illinois, it is time to expose all election fraud. Chicago & Cook County has been the blueprint for corruption in elections (and its politics) that I welcome full transparency, and transformation.

Avatar

L. C.9 months ago

Both. He is raising real concerns that may be nearly impossible to change at this moment. I appreciate Mike Johnson’s comment in support of President Trump’s concerns. Still talking about change is a step toward at least getting some people thinking about it.

Avatar

Photo Man9 months ago

"Thinking" about it does not actually mean there is any actual movement to effect change. There needs to be actual action.

Avatar

Scott Connell9 months ago

Remember the Democrats had their own election bill "For the People Act" (H.R. 1) in 2019 & 2021 which would make it easier for anyone within the US to vote - no ID needed! Should we be concerned about election integrity in certain states, hell yes, i.e. Fulton County, GA! Without doing an amendment to the Constitution, the SAVE Act is the next best thing. Maybe the Federal Govmnt can act as a secondary auditor forcing the States to provide voter rolls matched and tickets of number of votes cast? Whatever it is, the Democrats will fight it.

Avatar

Than Johnson9 months ago

I worry, what happens when the Democrats happen to win and take over elections? We demonstrated in this prior election that we can win and win big so why change it?

Also, some of our prior statements to Not vote absentee or mail-in caused a reduction in Republican votes. I would suggest we look where mail-in and absentee is occurring and we start a campaign to have more Republicans participate that way? Also, we need assure that our armed forces abroad, votes are counted. Than

Avatar

Photo Man9 months ago

Than, the Republicans did not "win big" during the past national election. Each chamber of Congress is only a bare razor thin margin in favor of the Repubs. If the Repubs do not take the lead and get voter reform legislation passed and into actual law, the DemolCommies will continue to have free rein to cheat however they desire. And all those mail-in and absentee ballots are all part of the huge voter fraud schemes. Along with all the deceased people that are still on the voter rolls and yet it has been proven that many of them still vote - amazing! And then add in the proven illegal immigrants illegal votes, we sure have a huge problem for fair, honest election integrity.

Avatar

Michael H.9 months ago

Federal elections are certainly being affected by state level corruption. I am a firm believer in the Constitution, but would like to see some sort of restructuring that gets rid of the state corruption in FEDERAL elections. If states are ok with their state representatives coming from faulty voting practices that's fine. But don't let large populations in places like NY and LA have such sweeping control over the rest of the country. But then, that goes bac to the fact that the federal government was never supposed to have as much control over state issues as hey currently do. The original blueprint given to us by our founders put heavy limitations on the amount of power in DC. We desperately need to return to the original plans.

Avatar

Photo Man9 months ago

"If states are ok with their state representatives coming from faulty voting practices that's fine." WHAT???? That is corruption. How can that be tolerated?

Avatar

Ken McEwen9 months ago

Election crimes need to have harsh punishments with severe minimum sentences and the courts cannot dismiss them without having a trial.

Avatar

Photo Man9 months ago

"courts" = meaning a judge and therein lies another whole problem. Some leftist almighty judge has more power than the President/Federal government, to shut down anything that does not align with the leftist liberal ideology.

Avatar

Michelle Hupp9 months ago

I certainly understand the concern of taking election regulation away from the states. However, as long as blue states continue to run their own elections, they will continue to be blue states. And there are attempts from left leaning shadow groups, to manipulate elections in red state. There should at least be some standards across the board for national elections.

Avatar

Randy Ness9 months ago

It's obvious that our Founding Fathers had no idea of the level of dishonesty and fraud that would creep into our election system. We can't have 50 States, each determining their own rules for Federal elections. There must be 1 standard that all States must follow. For State offices only, they can decide for themselves.

Avatar

David Shepherd9 months ago

The concerns are valid - and it is nearly impossible to refute that fraud is happening. The problem , however, cannot be solved by pushing back against constitutionally ordered elections. The founding document DOES allow for Federal oversight over the state designed systems. That is likely where and how fraud can best be eliminated

Avatar

Jorge Rios9 months ago

Trumps mythology is to always push and ask for more than what you reasonably expect to get, so when the dust settles the end result will bear more fruit.

Avatar

Terry McCall9 months ago

Trump is raising legitimate concerns but it's also true that a centralized federal election program is unconstitutional. Blue states are the problem so Republicans in those states need to take charge.

Avatar

Bob Hrebec9 months ago

I too am from Illinois, you'd have to look far and wide to find a more corrupt state and in particular the city of Chicago. Voter ID is a must as is over site on ballot counting. Mail in voting must stop unless it is a requested absentee ballot.

Avatar

Jim Powers 9 months ago

Both!

Avatar

Larry M9 months ago

As long as there are no prosecutions fraudulent states and bad actors have nothing to lose. There has to be regulations and that needs to come from the Feds. If we don't have fair and free elections we don't have a a country. We need to address this now and prosecute traitors and those committing seditious acts of which there are many. Less talk more action!

Avatar

Lee Shultz9 months ago

Too bad Constitution doesn't mean anything to anyone any more. At all the voting places I go to they have both Democrats and Republicans in them. Sometimes they give get Independents help work the polls. Elections are being erode away and a big part of it was election machines, also let's mail everyone a ballot and let one person turn them in.

Avatar

Tom Thomas9 months ago

Yes

Avatar

Lori Aquilone9 months ago

Our founding fathers established an election structure in the Constitution. They were well aware of tendencies toward abuse and corruption which is why they formed it that way. I have more faith in their wisdom than fear of machinations. Changing elections would require a new amendment.

Can you imagine how that would play out with a Democrat in office?!!!

Avatar

Jim Harmon9 months ago

As Speaker Johnson points out, the President has many reasons for being frustrated. He is solution-driven and he's searching for a workable process. Eliminating the counting of votes after the day of elections will solve a lot of the problems. Again, as Speaker Johnson pointed out, republican candidates who were leading when the election was mysteriously lost the lead when ballots were counted after closure. I wonder why the late ballots are largely votes for democrats. Obviously, voting should be managed by the states, but they shouldn't be allowed to count any vote not posted on election day.

Avatar

Scott Schmidt9 months ago

President Trump continually pushes ideas that prompt discussion and consternation, but it also causes Action, which is the result he wants. He pushed for better policing in Chicago and DC, forced discussion of control of Greenland, and is now raising the security and fairness of our elections. He is a fart in a whirlwind.

Avatar

Rene Andarwa9 months ago

It's like Greenland. It starts with the fed taking over and hopefully ends with law and order voting.

Avatar

Carla Wilson9 months ago

He’s definitely raising legitimate concerns; however, nationalizing elections seems like a difficult if not impossible solution.

Avatar

Jane Spring9 months ago

It would only be agreed upon if Republicans cheated like the democrats…then they would be agreeable to the idea of it. However I hope that does not happen.

Avatar

Doug Ebbecke9 months ago

Certainly we should all be concerned about election integrity, not just the president. Fair and honest elections at all levels are important or why bother voting. Mail in seems like a process thats two easy to manipulate unless it’s for overseas voting, especially for the military. Voter idea seems reasonable, I remember when it was required. If mail in is used it seems like being postmarked by Election Day should be very simple, but still subject to fraud. Even with a copy of a picture ID doesn’t fix that. Voting in person with a bigger window to vote in certainly makes the process easier.