_WHAT’S HAPPENING_

The Trump administration says it is making progress toward a potential agreement with Iran, offering a 15-point framework aimed at ending the war and permanently blocking Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. President Trump has signaled that talks are underway through intermediaries and delayed planned strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure to allow diplomacy to proceed, with tomorrow as the deadline for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran, however, rejected the US proposal as “excessive,” denied that meaningful negotiations are taking place, and insisted it will only agree to a ceasefire on its own terms. This comes as the president is telling his allies behind closed doors that he wants to wrap up the war within weeks.

_THE FACTS_

  • Trump confirmed the administration presented Iran with a 15-point proposal, delivered through Pakistani intermediaries, aimed at ending the conflict.

  • The Iranians reportedly rejected this proposal, calling many of Trump’s proposals “excessive.”

  • The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has hardened its position, vowing to continue the war until the US closes its bases in the region and provides reparations to Iran for its airstrikes.

  • White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt struck an optimistic tone during a Wednesday press conference, saying, “They recognize they are being crushed. Their ability to attack American and allied forces … is dwindling literally hour by hour.”

  • The Trump team reportedly pushed for a 30-day ceasefire to allow both sides to work toward a comprehensive peace agreement.

  • Iran continued launching attacks across Israel and the Gulf states, including a strike that caused a major fire at Kuwait International Airport.

  • Iranian sources said they would refuse to negotiate with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff or Jared Kushner.

  • Vice President JD Vance is supposedly Iran's preferred negotiator, with Iranian officials viewing him as "anti-war.”

  • A Pakistani source claimed that Vance, along with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, may soon meet with Iranian officials in Islamabad.

  • The Pentagon is now weighing options for a “final blow” against Iran that could involve ground troops and a large-scale bombing campaign.

_OUR TAKE_

As negotiations remain murky and largely hidden from public view, President Trump has stayed firm that Iran must never obtain nuclear weapons, a goal widely supported by Americans. At the same time, the president has strong incentives to project that the war is nearing an end, as large-scale military intervention remains unpopular and gas prices have risen steeply at home.

The Iranians appear intent on fighting to the bitter end, while also trying to exploit divisions within the GOP by elevating JD Vance as a lead negotiator, who they consider more skeptical of military action than Donald Trump or his envoys.

With the Friday deadline looming and thousands of US troops massing in the region, a “final blow” remains a real possibility. But it would be a high-stakes gamble for Trump, with little room for failure.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Jim Powers 8 months ago

Doesn’t matter. They’re still negotiating with Trump.

Avatar

Roger Kirkpatrick8 months ago

Regardless how the IRGC “sees” VP Vance, he must remain strong if he does get assigned to this thankless task. Ultimately it is a no-win cause foe whomever tries working with the Muslim liars.

Avatar

Kevin Mullen8 months ago

If that’s what it takes to get the deal across the finish line, then yes! If that’s the only concession we make so Iran can save face, then yes!

Avatar

Bill Roberts8 months ago

Doesn’t matter who the spokesperson is. Trump has the final word.

Avatar

Donna Marks8 months ago

Whatever it takes to end the conflict. I believe Vance is Trump's right hand so if Iran thinks they want to negotiate with Vance, let them. Trump will still be in the picture.

Avatar

J Y8 months ago

IRGC are essentially terrorist with radical ideology that will not be subverted or reasoned with. These are zealots that BELIEVE they are right. Unfortunately, only one way to deal with zealots is death. They will not surrender. You can’t not reason with people that are opposed to reason. More innocent people will die if the IRGC aren’t dealt with. Israel knows this. Israel has tried to reason. Look where it has gotten them. Now, they see.

Avatar

David Hooten8 months ago

Vance should be a part of the negotiations team. He has proven himself to be adroit at diplomacy. It will be tough, thought, because the Iranian leadership has shown itself to be deceitful and untrustworthy.

Avatar

Jennifer Vaughn8 months ago

I don't think the administration should allow Iran to manipulate them into making Vance the lead negotiator.

Avatar

Lee Shultz8 months ago

Don't see how Vance can help out at this point. Someone has to try to fix FRAUD in America. We are bleeding out as a nation and it has to be bandaged soon. Trump's Iran mess has reached a no win situate at this point. Sadly American best choice will get a lot good American's to die at this point.

Avatar

JJW JJW8 months ago

He can join the team, but Iran hasn't any cards to play. Surely they are not that niave and stupid.

Avatar

Jim Powers8 months ago

I don't care who represents the US as long as they bring demands with NO negotiation.

Avatar

John Richardson8 months ago

No to Vance. Iran wants him, that's reason enough to disqualify him.

Avatar

Sherry K8 months ago

I think Iran is prolonging this fiasco of “negotiations” to give China an opportunity to take Taiwan.

Avatar

JJW JJW8 months ago

He can join the team, but Iran haYborsn't any cards to play. Surely they are not that n and stupid.

Avatar

JJW JJW8 months ago

He can join the team,but Iran hasn't any cards to play. Surely they are not that niave and stupid. JJW

Avatar

Bob Hrebec8 months ago

There seems to be little choice but Vance needs to remember who he works for and which side he's on and maybe more importantly, that Muslims lie to your face and they're very good at it.

Avatar

Bernie Peer8 months ago

No, do not let Iran set the narrative. You cannot negotiate with those who don’t negotiate in good faith. It looks like Iran is not negotiating but demanding

Avatar

Daniel M Dunne8 months ago

No, I believe JD Vance will pull a Obama and will let us win the war and lose the negotiations. The Iranian people need to be free with a change of leadership. They are suffering under a Islam terrorist regime. Dan Dunne

Avatar

NoOne WhoMatters8 months ago

If Iran favors Vance, I trust him to have the best interest of the US in mind during negotiations.

Avatar

Janis Chester8 months ago

He's too tied to Tucker et al for this role.

Avatar

Barbara Dotson-Brooner8 months ago

Vance can be there but IRGC don’t dictate to us who talks to or negotiates with them. The negotiating team should huddle up prior to meeting with IRGC and Vance gives his input on strategy.

Avatar

Mary Verkuilen8 months ago

Absolutely not! Iran is banking on creating division within the Trump team and the American people who, because of fake media reports know practically nothing about what's happing in Iran in order to force the U.S. to stop the "war." America has to stay the course.

Avatar

Bonnie Hissom8 months ago

Whatever and whoever it takes to get a deal and end this conflict.

Avatar

Michael H.8 months ago

So long as Vance says on point and in step with Trump he is good to have as a negotiator. The fact that he does NOT want to be involved in another armed conflict in the middle east (not that Trump WANTS to) can be beneficial.I just pray he is successful and we put an end to uranium enrichment by the regime.

Avatar

Janet Null8 months ago

NO