_WHAT’S HAPPENING_

President Donald Trump came back into office promising to use protectionist policy — tariffs — to reshore American industry and fix what he saw as unfair global trade practices. On the campaign trail, he had talked about using tariffs on adversaries, like China, and on allies, like Canada.

Starting out as benign, Trumpian jokes about Canada becoming the “51st state” and “Governor Trudeau,” the president’s recent actions have begun to reveal a much more serious intent to absorb Canada into the United States. In response, the Canadians are uniting against Trump and the US.

_THE FACTS_

Trump’s desire to incorporate Canada into the United States first appeared in December 2024; in what the BBC called a “light jab,” the then-president-elect referred to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as the “governor” of Canada. At the dinner, Trudeau told Trump that his tariffs would “kill” Canada’s economy. In response, Trump asked Trudeau why, if Canada relied upon the United States so heavily, they would bother to remain independent at all.

Since then, Trump has doubled and tripled down on the idea of Canada becoming the 51st state, repeatedly calling Trudeau “governor” and making social media posts about the idea. Most recently, in a meeting with NATO chief Mark Rutte, Trump stated that Canada “only works as a state” and called the US-Canada border “artificial.” Trump has repeated the latter claim in conversations with Trudeau in which he reportedly said he does not accept the treaty demarcating the border.

Canada’s government is taking Trump’s threats seriously. Trudeau believes Trump is earnest about annexation, and even individuals who should be allies with the American president, like Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, have spoken out forcefully against Trump’s tariffs and annexation threats.

This message is reaching the rest of the world, too. At the ongoing G7 summit in Charlevoix, Quebec, Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly sent her G7 counterparts a stark warning: “If the US can do this to us, their closest friend, then nobody is safe.”

Canadian party leaders are joined by their people, who overwhelmingly do not want to be part of America. One poll found that around 90 percent of Canadians would vote against annexation.

_INSIGHTS_

Trump often adopts tough negotiating stances to get what he wants, but here, his stance appears to be backfiring. Canada is about to get a new prime minister, Mark Carney, as Trudeau is stepping down — and it is difficult to see how Carney, with an election coming up, will possibly back down to Trump. Trump has also severely damaged Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre’s chances of becoming prime minister. Just months ago, he was soundly leading in the polls. But now, a rally-around-the-flag effect has made the upcoming parliamentary elections significantly closer, with the Liberals potentially even holding their majority.

Americans also do not want Canada to be part of the United States. The same poll that showed 90 percent of Canadians opposing annexation found that 60 percent of Americans oppose it as well, and a majority of those who support it would only want annexation with Canadian consent.

The president's frustration with Canada's tariffs on dairy is understandable, and his interest in Canada’s critical minerals, like in Ukraine, is valid. However, he could have pursued the issue by levying tariffs or negotiating a mineral treaty without resorting to threats of annexation or demanding changes to the border.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Laney B1 year ago

I soon turn 70 and remember Canada as an ally and friend - manifested in such ways as rooting for Canadian Olympic teams when not in competition with U.S.A. The sea change occurred under Jean Chretien, the vocal hater of then-Pres. G.W. Bush, who led the Canadian people down the poison-path of scorn and derision for U.S. They haven't been "our friends" since.

Avatar

Bernie Peer1 year ago

I think Trump knows what he is doing. I say let this play out. I don’t think Trump wants Canada as a state. I think he’s trying to rattle them and it has worked. Why would he want another liberal state. Canada is used to socialism something we are trying to avoid. I think he’s should focus more on getting rid of liberalism in schools and government. I think he should take down the unions.

Avatar

Heidi Rothberg1 year ago

I still don't take Trump seriously concerning making Canada a US state. I wouldn't want to absorb them as they've been taken over by leftist ideology and the Marxist-Islamist factions. We have enough of that without importing more. I would prefer that Trump ease up a bit. I would like to see Poilievre succeed as prime minister.

Avatar

Alc Cookeville1 year ago

A sounder approach. He can just back off on the idea.

Avatar

Chris Carbott1 year ago

I thought the "initial humorous jab" was great. Everything since has become ridiculous and insulting. I don't blame the Canadians one bit for being offended. The idea, while economically sound in some respects, is just ludicrous in practical terms. We need to stop talking about it. It is backfiring not only in terms of Canada's attitude towards the US, but it could also lead to Canada voting for more suicidal Liberal Party "leadership."

Avatar

Jim Harmon1 year ago

I think the President's tariff war is a slippery slope. As a businessman, he has used tactics to influence outcomes in his favor and ultimately will do the same for the country. However, his popularity will likely wane if tariffs negatively affect us and open the door for democrats to regain approval. I also think that he should address the nation and explain why he believes tariffs will balance out in the end, benefiting the country. I also believe he has no sincere intention to make Canada the 51st state. Why would we want to inherit the total disfunction that is the Canadian government.

Avatar

Betty Smith1 year ago

Canada has always been a friend at arms length. I agree that dangerous drugs across the border must be stopped, however Canada has a complex society with many issues we don’t totally understand. First nations issues, French versus English differences, the vastness of their land and isolation of populations. Wonderful people but one must always be aware when traveling through that you are a visitor and respect them. My advice is back off on annexation!

Avatar

sharon smith1 year ago

At the time Trump was suggesting annexation, I thought he was just being all bluster, and even more than normal. There was no way Canadians would agree to such a move, but then they became all reactionary at the suggestion, which I had taken as a joke and suddenly it was all serious. Canadians are soooo sensitive. Trump should just back off or they may withhold the oil rights he gained during his first term.

Avatar

Gary B1 year ago

It is a little confusing. I don’t think Canada has been our friend for some time but what he expects to accomplish is unclear. He is a great negotiator but I am a little lost on this one. We don’t want all those liberals to be US citizens. Any people that would allow their government to do what they did to the truckers is concerning but then what Biden DOJ was no better to the J 6 ers

Avatar

Ardath Blauvelt1 year ago

Trump is often an effective, if foolish, disruptor, but this time, maybe just a foolish disruptor. This move backfired and the sooner he awkwardly retreats, the better. A behind the scenes mea culpa, a little boy Oops my joke got out of hand concession, is needed to extricate us all. Sadly, admitting a mistake and apologies are not in Trump's repertoire. Everybody loses. Get back to work, Donald.

Avatar

Kathryn Murphy1 year ago

I think his original joke, which Canadians took seriously, opened the door for more jokes from Trump. No, I don't think he wants Canada as a state. BUT, we're all looking at a possible WWIII. and I'll say that there is more safety, and speedier action, in size and numbers. Heck, if we also added Mexico, Puerto Rico, and the Islands we hold as territories, as states, it really wouldn't be a bad idea. Now, am I kidding or am I serious?

Avatar

Jim Ahern1 year ago

Canada is of little interest to the everyday practical American. It holds no definitive value, that we don't already have, and would be like having another stepchild to support. The tariffs are more than enough to snap Canada into line and make them understand the "free ride" days are over. All will pay their respective fair share. This goes double/triple for China who thinks it's Communist position is somehow appealing to other nations. They'll be schooled soon enough, just as the case was in the Panama Canal.

Avatar

Charles Williams1 year ago

"However, he could have pursued the issue by levying tariffs or negotiating a mineral treaty without resorting to threats of annexation or demanding changes to the border." Sound more like and opinion than fact. IMO it's a mute point as I suspect it's another ploy being used by President Trump, to encourage Canadian cooperation in immigration, trade and tariff negotiations. It seems to me that the extreme left in Canadian politics is waning just a bit.

💬 Join the discussion

Avatar

Lori Aquilone1 year ago

Wouldn’t the Canadians just inject strength to the far left democrats? Instead of being a lunatic, she’d be leading a tribe!

Avatar

Robert Gove1 year ago

I’m on a Caribbean cruise with many Canadians. One of the mcs, from Brazil, makes jokes about the “merger. “. Not met well by the Canadians.

Avatar

Monty Mickle1 year ago

Annexation of Canada is a bad idea because, for starters, it would result in more Democrat leaning states. Most Canadians and Americans don't want it, and didn't work out in the war of 1812. Talk of Annexation is plain silly.

Avatar

Than Johnson1 year ago

A US/Canadian partnership would make for the a strong protection alignment from outside adversaries. The large untapped natural resources of Canada that match the deep industrial base of US make for an excellent alliance. The only thing missing is an abundant workforce and/or technology that replaces the need for workforce. Independent countries can reach this type of agreement without threats. I’d rather US spend diplomatic time and energy on securing an arrangement or governmental change in Cuba and Venezuelan that result in Russian/Chinese influence be removed from our neighborhood. A bridge to Havana could be an interesting joint project.