_WHAT’S HAPPENING_

The United States and European Union are locked in a fundamental clash over who controls online speech.

Brussels — where the EU operates — insists it has the right to set standards for a 450-million-person market. The conflict centers on the EU's Digital Services Act, which requires platforms to limit illegal content and supposedly increase transparency.

The tension escalated dramatically when the EU imposed a €120 million fine against Elon Musk’s social media platform X. US officials responded with visa sanctions on European regulators and accusations that Brussels is conducting a "decade-long" censorship campaign.

_THE FACTS_

  • When the European Commission announced a €120 million fine against X for breaching the Digital Services Act, Elon Musk responded with one word: "Bullsh**."

  • The EU's Digital Services Act requires large online platforms to limit the spread of illegal content and increase transparency of how platforms operate.

  • EU Tech Chief Henna Virkkunen pushed back: "The DSA has nothing to do with censorship. We are fully respecting the freedom of speech."

  • However, Vice President JD Vance accused the EU of "attacking American companies over garbage.”

  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized the fine as "an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments."

  • The State Department is developing Freedom.gov designed to give people in heavily censored countries, including China, Iran, and across Europe, access to the same uncensored internet available in the US.

  • The US imposed a visa ban against former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton and four others for censoring and coercing American social media platforms.

  • A House Judiciary Committee report alleged the EU conducted a "decade-long campaign" to censor the global internet.

  • Republican lawmakers claim EU Internet Forum guidelines encouraged platforms to moderate "populist rhetoric," "anti-government/anti-EU" sentiment, "political satire," and "meme subculture.”

_OUR TAKE_

Although US military conflicts have dominated headlines lately — from Venezuela to Iran — a more persistent, and perhaps more troubling, battle has been unfolding over free speech, with Europe playing a central role in its erosion.

Stories have been popping up for years over police raids in Germany and the UK over offensive internet posts, the suppression of right-leaning parties in France, and regulatory crackdowns across the EU that expand government oversight of online speech in the name of combating “misinformation.”

The United States is poised to be one of the last bastions of free speech in the world, making the Trump administration’s objectives of combating censorship a singularly crucial priority.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Dave Densmore8 months ago

The first mistake the Europeans made was allowing the EU to begin with because the people of the European nations don't have true representation in the EU. The second mistake was allowing the EU to become socialist, and leaning more and more totalitarian, evidenced by this blatant attempt to limit speech that disagrees with their narrative. Should the EU have freedom of speech like our 1st Ammendment? Yes of course, but it's not going to happen now, because the ones controlling the speech are the ones making the laws. Dave D

Avatar

Michael H.8 months ago

It is impossible to have FREE SPEECH if the government calls something said "illegal". The term "misinformation" is arbitrary on it own. What one person considers "false information" may be the truth to another person. Who gets to decide what is prohibited speech and what is legal to say? If the powers that be in the eu don't like what is said on a platform, they can not subscribe to that platform. If the PEOPLE of Europe want to be able to see/read/hear what is on those platforms they need to tell the eu to shove it.

Avatar

Jennifer H8 months ago

Free speech. Sounds simple. Sounds easy. It truly is not. Free speech does not allow you to knowingly outright lie, commit slander/libel, or incite someone to commit an illegal act. It does allow you to state your opinion. My opinion can not be contrary to someone’s truth. True truth is truly absolute. However, we no longer know the difference between truth and opinion, facts and feelings, science and beliefs. True free speech should be universally respected; however, too many people (adamantly/violently) don’t want to hear an opinion that doesn’t mirror their own.

Avatar

Michael H.8 months ago

Sadly, free speech DOES allow for someone to lie. Politicians do it all the time. While our 1st amendment does have some restrictions on slander and incitement to violence, those things technically are still free speech. For example, I can say that I believe someone (for sake of argument considering current events) is a pedophile without providing actual proof because I am stating an opinion. That is free speech. Saying someone IS a pedophile without PROOF is prohibited by law in legal matters, but is still free speech. It is up to those listening to determine fact from fiction.

I agree that the world population has become polarized and segmented and groups insist things be seen THEIR WAY or no way at all. The gray area no longer exists. And deciding on truth is becoming more difficult with all the voices clamoring on the internet. I do believe some technological advances are more a hindrance than an enhancement to life.

Avatar

Kelly Gilbert8 months ago

The words "Mis-Information" or "Dis-Information" do not exist in the real world. They are make believe words invented by Tyrannical censorship efforts that describe an opinion that the Ruling elite dislikes. It is not a "Lie" or a "truth". It is an opinion. Free speech should never impede the opinions of others, no matter how much we may dislike an opinion.

Avatar

Philip Belhumeur8 months ago

That would be up to the European people. If they are willing to have their liberty usurped by totalitarian governments, they have my condolences..... and no one to blame but themselves. Our Constitution is what makes the USA the greatest country in history and world's beacon of freedom. Phil B

Avatar

Magvitum8 months ago

I hope the europeans are not going back to the first WW years.....

Avatar

James G.8 months ago

Oh they are. Call me crazy, but the pattern I see is not only obvious, but it's happened many times before. Europe is being set up for another huge war.

Avatar

Jim Harmon8 months ago

It would be nice if the EU were to adopt a first amendment approach to free speech, but that's not likely to happen. What's happening in Europe is indicative of how far it has fallen. Millions of illegal immigrants is at the heart of it.

Avatar

Laney B8 months ago

You're right. Just like US "HPPA" laws were born out of keeping AIDS a secret, these restrictive speech laws come from the muslim takeover of EU.

Avatar

James G.8 months ago

Sadly it doesn't stop there. Thousands of women's voices in Europe are going unnoticed, being ignored, b/c those in power don't want to be labeled "racist or Islamophobic." These are voices of women being raped by Muslim 'grooming-gangs.' It's reported there is a rape every 60 minutes. And these poor, poor women's voices are being silenced. It truly hurts my heart.

Avatar

Laney B8 months ago

The EU can control speech only if they want to be the new "Dark Continent". If you want Americans as part of your marketing audience, you don't get to censor us or threaten us if we enter your lands.

Avatar

Alc Cookeville8 months ago

They will stew in their own juice. They put their blinders on. Hans Christian Andersen had an amusing story about how well that works... Kids understand it at least by age five. People do not have internal guidance systems, so we need input from others. To avoid being fools. Sooner or later the EU and the UK will collapse under notions that they have which are FALSE, but they won't hear correction, especially sarcastic corrections. And partly to not offend the elephant in the room: Muslim immigrants who have ZERO interest in being assimilated.

Avatar

James G.8 months ago

On that note, I got into it today while checking in for jury duty. Two Muslim women were in front of me. The younger of the two was explaining to the person behind the counter that her mother didn't speak English and need to be "excused from jury duty." I immediately spoke up and said, "maybe it's time to learn English, the American language."

Funny thing, they BOTH turned around! The younger said "excuse me?!" I replied, "When my grandparents migrated here form Italy, the first thing they did was learn the language. Then they assimilated and became naturalized, legal citizens. Don't you think it's about time you do the same?"

Long story short, another teller came from out of the back and broke up the conversation by checking me in. I winked at the older Muslim woman on my way out, basically signaling to her that I know she understands English!

Assimilate or get the f**k out. I can say that as a grandson of immigrants. I'm tired of these unassimilated douches. GO HOME!

Avatar

Michael H.8 months ago

The understanding that assimilation is part of the process of immigration has been lost. There are so many who are afraid people will lose touch with their heritage they say that learning English is not a necessity. I call BS on that.

My father's side of my bloodline came here from Germany. They WELCOMED learning English because they wanted to be part of the American people and way of life.(My mother's side came primarily from Scotland...of course, they had to learn AMERICAN English. Hahaha)

All of these people who are supposedly coming to be art of the American dream, but still fly a flag of another country and refuse to learn/speak English don't deserve the freedoms granted by being here. That's MY opinion.

Oh, and the idea of "my truth is a load of crap too. There is THE truth. One may chose not to belive THE truth, but that doesn't change the fact that it is THE truth. (Rant over)

Avatar

Paul Bohac8 months ago

Freedom of speech is a core principle and element of freedom. That said, any effort to restrict or control speech is a direct attack on both personal and society's freedom. Consequently, all such efforts should be viewed not as attempts to minimize the spread of mis- or dis- information but as outright war on both one's personal and the society's freedom. A complicating issue is the absence of regulatory control over AI use in the public domain. Who can or does know the extent to which an expressed "personal opinion" was human generated versus AI generated?

Avatar

James G.8 months ago

Right! People are devious enough, even when standing right in front of you...AI just made the digital world less believable. I even wonder about Upward News and these discussions.....Are You real, Paul? Am I?

Avatar

Michael H.8 months ago

I have come across my fair share of "bot antagonists" in chat rooms and on comment threads. I have to say, I have yet to encounter that here with Upward News. Even when I KNOW a comment is generated by a program, as opposed to a real human being, I will make at least SOME sort of compelling argument for the sake of other REAL people reading the thread. After a while, when the bot resorts to nothing but name calling, I will stop responding. I generally don't engage with real people who can't make a valid point and not resort to throwing a temper tantrum. I have said it many times, it is up to each person to decide what to believe. I can only state MY position on a subject. Hopefully I can give reference to the validity of my statements when needed.

Avatar

James G.8 months ago

As a true patriot, I believe the citizens of other countries should decide what type of control they want for themselves and their children. "Should the EU have a 1st Amendment, like the USA?" That's up to the citizens in that country.

However, the fallout is this: I refuse to visit countries that are Less like America. I.E. they will Not benefit from my tourist dollars. Nor will I purchase products from those countries - to the best of my ability that is! I despise purchasing Chinese made products, but if that's all there is available And I Need the product, well.... Other than that, I personally boycott all countries that are less like America.

Avatar

Michael H.8 months ago

Amen to purchasing American made, or at least not buying products made in COMMUNIST china. I have made a direct effort to NOT buy ANYTHING made by or that benefits the communist chinese government. I refuse to finance a government that hates my way of life and my government. There are plenty of American made products, or at least made by an ally of America, to choose from. Sadly, in many stores they only carry chinese made items. If I have NO other choice then yes, I will buy the product. But only if I MUST have it. If I can live without it, I will pass.

Avatar

Mary Verkuilen8 months ago

You can't force the EU to be right but the US first amendment is probably the best thing to emulate when it comes to free speech. It is unique in the world and Americans should be very proud of it and should use it at every opportunity. If we don't fight to protect and love our way of life, we will surely lose it.

Avatar

Lee Shultz8 months ago

'Do you think Europe’s speech laws should be compatible with the US’ First Amendment?' IF Europe share our same values and wants a strong continue relationship with things like NATO then act like it. IF they do not that's okay but we should stop protecting them and let them chart there own future. Maybe US will end up controlling Greenland after all?

Avatar

Shaun Hurrie8 months ago

If the platform being used by Europeans is an American platform, then THEY must abide by OUR laws. So, yes, their speech laws must be compatible with the 1st Amendment👍 - Shaun

Avatar

Michael Nelson8 months ago

Illegal content meaning truth that the government does not want exposed: like violence committed by Islamic gangs in England and Europe.

Avatar

David Hooten8 months ago

Yes, but with the same safeguards that the US is putting in place. They should mirror each other. While Europe has the right to pass their own laws, they should not just punish what they view as "offensive". They are in tight spots in other areas like immigration and energy now. They have done stupid things like trying to put Danish farmers out of business for their overly ridiculous "green" policies.

Avatar

Jim Ahern8 months ago

This is yet another one of those, "why is this even a question?", type topics. Why in the 21 century are we living in a world where the most practical, rational and reasonable viewpoints are touted as "mis-information"? There are clearly lines in the sand and rights and wrongs in life, period. Unlike an opinion, you're not entitled to your own truth, there is just thee truth. Free Speech comes with a responsibility as far as I'm concerned, if you breech that most basic principle then you don't get to hide behind the Constitution. You get to be held accountable for violating the publics trust with lies and propaganda and you face swift and heavy consequences. As usual it all comes back to accountability which we have none of in any real capacity. In short, the US, although better than the EU, is nobody to be giving moral advice on how to handle free speech. Or do we need a history lesson on 2020 when censorship ran wild in this country. Still does, they just hide it better..

Avatar

Fred Scott8 months ago

Without exception, the EU should allow First Amendment rights as the United States does. It's inconceivable that European leaders would plan to restrict freedom of speech. And if they do, I will be extremely disappointed, and just reinforces just the idea that Europe is pro-Islamist and Maoist. As the globalist oppression is being seen.- Fred