_WHAT’S HAPPENING_

The Pentagon announced it will withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany, a decision that follows weeks of escalating tensions between President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over the Iran war. The move represents about one-seventh of the roughly 38,000 American service members currently stationed in Germany, home to Ramstein Air Base and US European Command headquarters.

The withdrawal comes after Merz criticized American handling of the war, telling students that Washington was "being humiliated by the Iranian leadership." Trump fired back on Truth Social, accusing Merz of supporting Iran's nuclear ambitions and announcing his administration was reviewing troop levels.

_THE FACTS_

  • The Pentagon confirmed the withdrawal of approximately 5,000 troops from Germany, to be completed within six to 12 months.

  • Trump told reporters the cuts would go "way down" and "a lot further than 5,000," suggesting additional reductions may be coming.

  • The president also suggested that these troops could be relocated to Poland.

  • Germany currently hosts about 38,000 US troops, the largest American military presence in Europe, including Ramstein Air Base, headquarters for US Air Forces in Europe.

  • Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-MS) and House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) warned the move "risks undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to Vladimir Putin."

  • Congress passed legislation in 2026 requiring a minimum of 76,000 American troops in Europe, which the current drawdown does not violate.

  • Trump previously attempted to withdraw 12,000 troops from Germany in 2020, but the plan faced bipartisan Congressional resistance and was not completed before Biden took office.

  • Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk called the rift between Europe and the US a "disastrous trend," warning that "the greatest threat to the transatlantic community are not its external enemies, but the ongoing disintegration of our alliance."

_OUR TAKE_

The United States has maintained significant troop levels in Europe since the Cold War to ensure a sufficient NATO presence to deter Russia from encroaching further on the continent. Even after a mass drawdown of US troops after the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, thousands of forces still remained as a "tripwire" for Article 5 to enable a rapid military response and to project power in Europe.

Trump’s current withdrawal reflects his frustration with Europe over its response to the Iran war, but it also signals the continued shift toward burden-sharing within NATO. While the immediate military impact is limited — 5,000 troops represent roughly 13 percent of US forces in Germany and only three percent of the total American military presence in Europe — it sends a message that the US will take action against its European allies if they criticize the nation that carries the military burden so they can spend more on social programs.

See more Upward News in Google: add us as a preferred source

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Dale Lytle6 months ago

Yes absolutely. For years I've thought the US should reduce forces in EU, Japan and Korea and make the people we are protecting step up and protect themselves more. Doing so would reduce our costs, make the protectees citizens more involved, AND worry Russia and China about more than the USA.

Avatar

Jorge Rios6 months ago

It is well overdue that Europe steps up and does its part to take care of itself without constant support from the U.S.

Avatar

Photo Man6 months ago

Is Trump right to punish Germany over its criticisms?" Just because 'someone' makes a critical statement, does not mean 'someone' should automatically be reprimanded. Germany, as part of the EU and NATO, whom have not lived up to the expectation of defending their own homeland, all at the expense of the USA, need to become much more serious about defending themselves. It has been very surprising to me that many of those EU countries have not been more concerned about helping Ukraine than they have. But it all boils down to the EU is beholden to that cheap Russian oil and EU is not doing anything to disrupt that flow of liquid.

Avatar

Bob Tasker6 months ago

Yes, in fact consider a larger troop withdrawal. It appears clear that Germany and all of Europe would be viable targets for Iranian nukes. In many cases the Iranians would not need to launch a missile, but rather load the weapon on a van or truck. Very short sighted of the German government (include Spain, the UK, and others) to bite the hand that protects. Not to mention the amount of hard currency the troops spend in German towns. Send the troops to Poland. Bob Tasker

Avatar

Alison Green6 months ago

Yes! It’s time for Europe to protect itself. Let them decide for themselves between protection from Russia vs. social programs.

Avatar

Michael H.6 months ago

Thing is, they are actually being invaded by islamic radicals and it is tearing them apart from the inside. Russia hasn't had to lift a finger. You will also notice that Russia is not having the issues with islamic refugees that the rest of the EU is having. The "refugees" know better than to test Putin on his soil.

Avatar

Fred Scott6 months ago

He certainly is, it's long overdue!

Avatar

sharon smith6 months ago

He is within his rights, but it looks petty. And who said it was in retaliation? I believe he is simply attempting to save money and realign forces to Poland in order to stave off Russian threats on that country

Avatar

Roger Kirkpatrick6 months ago

Without a doubt!

Avatar

Leon Powell6 months ago

Promoting a false media narrative. Oh it's just about the criticism of Trump. What about the truth ? How much should we give ? Not just the money, but the lives, limbs, and blood. Even during the cold war thousands were lost due to training accidents, and other calamities. As a Reagan era vet I served in Germany, I patrolled the West German borders, I slayed the Green Dragon ( for those who know ). The cold war is over, but I'm not sure who really won. Us silly Americans with our capitalistic ways, rugged individualism and freedom. No they choose to embrace socialism ( Communism light ). And now they stand by as the demographic change of muslim so called immigration ( really invasion ) continues. This is clearly Islamic doctrine, in 1900 their were 17 muslim Countries and today they're 56, they've done this over and over again, as they keep doing it now in Europe and even the US.

Avatar

Michael H.6 months ago

My brother was stationed in Germany in the mid-late 80s. He told me about standing behind a fence on ONE side of a stretch of green and looking at Russian troops with AKs on the other side of their own fence. Knowing that at any second bullets might be flying across. All it would take is just one itchy trigger finger or some idiot not practicing trigger discipline and getting a little too nervous, or just shaking from the cold. I couldn't imagine staring down our enemy in such a way, I've never served (type 1 diabetic) so I have never known that kind of situation. I am eternally grateful for those, like you, who have over the years...even in "peace time."

Avatar

Photo Man6 months ago

Leon Powell & Michael H. brother, Thank You for your service to aid defending freedom!!

Avatar

Than Johnson6 months ago

It sends a signal to German, Poland, NATO……US strength will still be in Eastern Europe. It also moves more US troop closer to the he Baltic countries and Communist Russia enclave Kaliningrad . Than

Avatar

Michael H.6 months ago

It is long past time for our military to be scaled back in Europe. We have been the protective shield for Europe for decades. While we do need the allies in Europe, they need us more. And for them to trash our sitting president for doing something that will ultimately protect ALL of the world, they need to be checked.

There IS a push from the right in Germany that is happening right now. I'm sure once this right leaning portion of the people are able to gain a real footing in the government, the rhetoric from the left there will taper off.

Avatar

David Hooten6 months ago

Yes. The German Chancellor should have discussed this with Trump before opening his big mouth. This was a forced error on his part.

Avatar

Jim Harmon6 months ago

I believe the President is justified in holding Germany accountable for bolstering Iran's resolve, knowing he isn't being supported by his NATO allies. However, I don't like he's using our troops as means to do that. Many of those likely to affected are established residents with kids in school, etc. I think there is a way to draw down without affecting those troops in Germany. One typical to do that is to identify billets that won't be replaced as those members transition to another duty station.

Avatar

Jim Ahern6 months ago

This shouldn't be about punishment over petty unfounded comments by Leftist Chancellor Merz. We should have already withdrawn a majority of forces from serving over seas. Let these countries manage their own militias as we do. If they are true allies and they face a threat, then we can deploy military support as needed. But to station a large amount of US military to babysit these countries indefinitely is asinine, counter-productive to our own national security and damn well costly to the American taxpayer. Isn't it amazing how those who serve in government never consider the big picture and in turn how much easier it would be to streamline operations. Makes you wonder, are they really not that bright or is it part of the grand scheme of it all??

Avatar

Jennifer Vaughn6 months ago

Germany and Europe are freeloaders. The US is responsible for too much military protection over there, while they get to spend more of their tax money on social programs. So the US is indirectly funding their social programs.

Avatar

Don G6 months ago

Shifting troops from one place to another does not necessarily impact Europe.

Avatar

Andrea V6 months ago

I don't think this is over a critical statement. It is time for Germany as well as the rest of Europe do their part. Why should we continue to support them with our troops when they have nothing to support the U.S.

Avatar

G Lewis6 months ago

Simple question... How much has Germany spent in the last 70 years supporting the USA?

Avatar

Diane L.6 months ago

Absolutely

Avatar

Guy M.6 months ago

Tough question today.

A primary downside to reducing our presence in Germany is the signal it sends to Russia. Given their history of territorial expansion, I am concerned that such a move could be perceived as a strategic opening and might prompt negative action on their part.

However, I believe the domestic situations in Germany and Great Britain are creating an increasingly dangerous environment for our soldiers stationed there. We mustn't ignore these historical and geopolitical contexts when making decisions about troop deployments.

Avatar

Doug Ebbecke6 months ago

Short answer is yes. If they want our military presence and strength it should cost them something in return. Less tariffs and better trade deals overall. And they should help to make things better overall, such as a slight assist in Iran as they will benefit more than we will. Criticizing our actions is indirectly supporting Iran or at least encouraging them.

Avatar

Shaun Hurrie6 months ago

Absolutely yes!

Avatar

Jeffrey Beste6 months ago

Yes, if ever there was a time we need Europe to stand with us now is the time discussions and criticisms behind closed doors is a whole Nother deal but in public there should absolutely be unity with all we do to keep Europe safe and the burden that we carry for them

Keep reading

View more
caret-right