MAHA Scores Win on Farm Bill

There are a number of chemicals used on the foods we eat that should never be part of the process, in my opinion. I believe these chemicals, particularly growth hormones in animals, have contributed to a number of health issues the younger generations are now facing. The long term effects of some of these chemicals is just not known. They can project all they want, but the actual effects can be very different from their projected outcomes. Ultimately it is up to the consumer to judge what is right for them and to act accordingly.

I am especially happy to hear about the added support for fruit and nut tree damages from storms. I have friends who own orchards who had serious damages from hurricane Hellene. They lost multiple older and newer trees due to the storm. This is affecting their bottom line. They need financial help replacing those lost trees. I hope they get it from this bill.

We are feeding our children and killing them slowly it doesn’t make sense we are the only country that spray poison on our food to dry it out has to be a better way.

It's time that companies take responsibility for their products that harm people, and guidelines should be available to encourage proper use, minimizing potential use and harm.

Yes!!! Our food needs to be safe!!

Yes, we need to bring our country back to healthy ways of producing and consuming food! Many have suffered so much with constant health issues because of poison in our foods.

Yes, we older people have already been poisoned, perhaps irreparably, but our kids still have a chance if we make some changes.

It appears to me that too many people on here are getting their info about glyphosate from uneducated sources like the 'food babe'! I suggest if you want to know the truth about farming and pesticides that you check out the Farm Babe!

Overall, a lot of humanity can be self centered at times, including myself. With that said, pesticides are new to the world. Think about it. There's archeology evidence of human life on this planet dating back 10's of thousands of years. You and I are alive because our ancestors thrived. THEY didn't need cancerous drugs to grow food.

No, this issue is much deeper. I'm not an economist but I do know that farmers are squeezed to death with red tape and regulations. Leaving them no choice But to use pesticides to sustain their industry.

And this is the point where the proverbial 'light bulb' should go off in your mind! Red tape and regulations were put in place for the sole purpose of pushing this pesticide agenda. It's about big pharma and their love for $ not human life.

Look, England should be 'under water by now.' Look @ all the other scare tactics from 'environmentalists,' this pesticide issue has nothing to do with reality. It's yet another pompous, self centered power struggle.

Big Pharma could invade the agriculture sector by aligning with big pesticide makers. Any prohibition should not negatively impact the Farmer. Agriculture is one of the main strength of USA. The American Farmer out produces the rest of the world. Its existence is so vitally important. We need to ensure China buys its agreed upon soybean purchases and also provide protection to the American dairy farmer from unfair competition with subsidies going to foreign producers. Than

It's amazing how the government and their agencies, FDA in this case, love to over-complicate simple matters. How hard is it in this day and age to put out healthy, non-gmo synthesized foods, especially when we unequivocally know they're bad for your health on so many levels? Same goes for Big Pharma and Big Ag in this instance. But that's just the point folks and it's so obvious in this day and age that the (Gov./Agencies) can give a shit less about the health of the The American People. And seemingly with his support of Bayer/Monsanto old man Trump/Admin. can give a care less also.. Why?, because it's all about MONEY for these 1% billionaires/corporations folks. It's all about the bottom line, health of the nation be damned. Sadly these little MAHA moves aren't solving the bigger problem, just band-aids which will be ripped off by the next hard-line "Establishment" leaning Administration...

Please inform the masses that Roundup (glyphosate) Is a herbicide (kills weeds)- NOT a pesricide (kills bugs)

Limiting liability equally limits the caution the public needs to prevent Bad products to be marketed by demands of corporate profits. We need look NO Further than the REAL Information now emerging on the "Wuhan vaccines"!

Yes.

"Do you support the removal of the pesticide provisions from the farm bill?" NO! As a result, the greedy American public with the greedy lawyers and accentuated with a liberal leftist 'green' judge and in cohorts with a likewise hand picked jury, will only to continue to harm immensely what few choices of effective safe pesticides we have in production agriculture.

"Todays' Debate" asks the question: "Who is the farm bill a bigger win for?" MAHA or MAGA or Both? The real answer is none of the above. Since somewhere in the range of 70 to 75% of the so-called Farm Bill is mandated for SNAP food aid subsidy, and the balance actually helps American food producers, the real beneficiary of the so-called Farm Bill is the American public.

Upward quote: "While MAHA helped get Trump elected, they are demonstrably opposed to some of the president’s agenda when tension arises with Big Agriculture." Upward, what is your definition for "Big Agriculture"? Why are you subjecting them to 'blame'? On the onset, I venture you really do not understand commercial production agriculture. And I certainly learned the true validity of that when I was a Cornell student and your community of Jews came to the Agriculture college (since tuition was much cheaper than the other colleges within Cornell). Your community is very book smart but when it came to practicality, they were completely lost. And that is still what the ag community today is fighting in this anti-pesticide environment. MSM/'green' movement Pure Lies and people think that "alleged/perceived" means proof, when it does not.